State Rankings
Where Teacher Pay Improved Most (2019-2023)
States where estimated teacher pay grew most from FY2019 to FY2023 in NCES F-33 data: a release-over-release comparison, not a single-year snapshot.
- +39.3%
- #1 most improved (New Hampshire)
- +17.0%
- National mean
- +14.0%
- National median
- 49
- States ranked
The ranking at a glance
New Hampshire ranks first at +39.3%. Across 49 ranked jurisdictions, the estimated teacher-pay change since FY2019 ranges from +5.8% to +39.3%; the median is +14.0%.
- #1
- New Hampshire · +39.3%
- +14.0%
- Median across ranked jurisdictions
- +34.0%
- Spread from highest to lowest
What This Ranking Tells Us
This ranking compares each state's average estimate across a balanced panel of the same districts in FY2019 and FY2023. The fixed cohort reduces district entry and exit as a source of apparent change, but the result remains a derived district-level estimate rather than an individual raise or salary schedule.
By the Numbers: Where Teacher Pay Improved Most (2019-2023)
This ranking covers 49 jurisdictions. Alaska and Illinois have no district with a usable teacher-salary estimate in this extract (reported salary between $30k and $200k with enrollment of at least 200), so they are omitted rather than imputed. It uses estimated teacher-pay change since FY2019 from the NCES Common Core of Data F-33 Local Education Agency Finance Survey, FY2023. New Hampshire leads the list at +39.3%, while New Mexico sits at the bottom with - - a +33.5% spread between the highest and lowest reporting state. The national mean is +16.5% with a median of +14.5%, a gap that reveals how concentrated the top of the distribution is.
- Scope: this page reports the ordering produced by the documented FY2023 source fields and transformations. It does not infer why a state occupies a position, predict a policy outcome, or substitute for a local salary schedule, contract, or benefits record. Use the state profile and the methodology to inspect the data and calculation behind a row.
- Salary methodology: the estimate is derived from NCES F-33 instructional-salary expenditure and reported teacher FTE. It is a district-level aggregate, not an individual contract or total-compensation figure. The multi-year ranking compares a fixed district cohort, so a change is a change in this derived estimate rather than proof of any individual raise. Click a state below for its district-level context and source notes.
The top 3
All ranked jurisdictions
The pale bar behind each figure shows its magnitude within this table; hover a value for the exact comparison and rank.
| # | State | Change since FY2019 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Hampshire NH | |
| 2 | Mississippi MS | |
| 3 | Delaware DE | |
| 4 | Oregon OR | |
| 5 | Nevada NV | |
| 6 | Arizona AZ | |
| 7 | Colorado CO | |
| 8 | California CA | |
| 9 | Idaho ID | |
| 10 | South Carolina SC | |
| 11 | Washington WA | |
| 12 | Maine ME | |
| 13 | Ohio OH | |
| 14 | Georgia GA | |
| 15 | Massachusetts MA | |
| 16 | West Virginia WV | |
| 17 | Rhode Island RI | |
| 18 | Alabama AL | |
| 19 | Virginia VA | |
| 20 | Michigan MI | |
| 21 | Kansas KS | |
| 22 | Maryland MD | |
| 23 | Hawaii HI | |
| 24 | Missouri MO | |
| 25 | Wisconsin WI | |
| 26 | Pennsylvania PA | |
| 27 | Minnesota MN | |
| 28 | Indiana IN | |
| 29 | Kentucky KY | |
| 30 | Vermont VT | |
| 31 | Tennessee TN | |
| 32 | Montana MT | |
| 33 | North Dakota ND | |
| 34 | Louisiana LA | |
| 35 | Florida FL | |
| 36 | New Jersey NJ | |
| 37 | Wyoming WY | |
| 38 | Connecticut CT | |
| 39 | Texas TX | |
| 40 | South Dakota SD | |
| 41 | New York NY | |
| 42 | Nebraska NE | |
| 43 | Arkansas AR | |
| 44 | Iowa IA | |
| 45 | Oklahoma OK | |
| 46 | North Carolina NC | |
| 47 | District of Columbia DC | |
| 48 | Utah UT | |
| 49 | New Mexico NM |
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD) F-33 Survey (FY2019 and FY2023 releases).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which state improved teacher pay the most since 2019?
The first row shows the state with the largest estimated increase in average teacher pay from FY2019 to FY2023 in this comparison. This measures the CHANGE, not the current salary level - a state can rank high here while still paying below the national average in absolute terms.
Why does this ranking use FY2019-FY2023 instead of the latest single year?
A single year cannot show change. This ranking uses the same district LEAIDs in both NCES releases and keeps one estimation method across the fixed panel within each state.
Does a negative number mean teacher pay actually fell?
It means the average estimate for the same district cohort was lower in FY2023 than FY2019. It does not establish that any individual teacher's pay fell; enrollment and spending changes inside those districts still affect the estimate.
Explore More Rankings
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
According to the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) F-33 Local Education Agency Finance Survey, PlainTeacher's figures are computed directly, no number is typed in by an editor. This ranking is computed directly from each district's FY2023 F-33 submission, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error on this page. Data current as of FY2023.
| Publisher | PlainTeacher |
| Sources | Public official public datasets |