State Rankings
Highest Paying States for Teachers by Average Salary
Highest paying states for teachers and average teacher salary by state, ranked from NCES F-33 FY2023 instructional-salary expenditure per reported teacher FTE for jurisdictions with a usable district estimate.
- $124,986
- #1 top salary (District of Columbia)
- $69,867
- Mean across states
- $66,733
- Median across states
- 49
- States ranked
Well above benchmark
The ranking at a glance
District of Columbia pay #1 is not California enrollment #1. District of Columbia ranks #1 of 49 on the unweighted mean teacher-salary estimate ($124,986, 1 reliable district) but California ranks #1 of 49 by enrollment in that same pool (5,249,524 students, salary rank #2). The highest-paying jurisdiction is not the largest. Alaska and Illinois have no district with a usable teacher-salary estimate in this extract (reported salary between $30k and $200k with enrollment of at least 200), so they are omitted rather than imputed.
- Pay #1
- District of Columbia · $124,986
- Enroll #1
- California · 5,249,524
- 49
- Jurisdictions in the pool
What This Ranking Tells Us
This state-by-state comparison estimates average instructional-staff pay from the same FY2023 NCES F-33 finance inputs for every jurisdiction. It is useful for comparing the dataset across states, but it is not an individual teacher contract, a starting-salary schedule, or a cost-of-living-adjusted measure.
By the Numbers: Highest Paying States for Teachers by Average Salary
This ranking covers 49 jurisdictions. Alaska and Illinois have no district with a usable teacher-salary estimate in this extract (reported salary between $30k and $200k with enrollment of at least 200), so they are omitted rather than imputed. It uses estimated average teacher salary from the NCES Common Core of Data F-33 Local Education Agency Finance Survey, FY2023. District of Columbia leads the list at $124,986, while Arkansas sits at the bottom with $43,221 - a $81,765 spread between the highest and lowest reporting state. The mean across states is $69,867 with a median of $66,733 (an unweighted average of each state's own average - not the same as the site-wide district-level average shown elsewhere), a gap that reveals how concentrated the top of the distribution is.
- Scope: this page reports the ordering produced by the documented FY2023 source fields and transformations. It does not infer why a state occupies a position, predict a policy outcome, or substitute for a local salary schedule, contract, or benefits record. Use the state profile and the methodology to inspect the data and calculation behind a row.
- Salary methodology: the estimate is derived from NCES F-33 instructional-salary expenditure and reported teacher FTE. It is a district-level aggregate, not an individual contract or total-compensation figure. The multi-year ranking compares a fixed district cohort, so a change is a change in this derived estimate rather than proof of any individual raise. Click a state below for its district-level context and source notes.
The bar to make this top-12 list
Distribution of estimated average teacher salaries across states and D.C.
$81,933 Top 24% higher than 76% of 49 states
Show national distribution
Each bar is a $5K-wide band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source NCES CCD F-33 Finance Survey, FY2023 · FY2023
Nominal salary versus purchasing power
Each point is one state or D.C. The horizontal value is the FY2023 NCES-derived salary estimate used in this ranking; the vertical value adjusts that same estimate with BEA's FY2023 all-items Regional Price Parity. Points above the horizontal midpoint retain more purchasing power than their nominal position alone suggests. This is not a tax, benefits, housing-budget, or individual-offer comparison.
Read the chart as text
- District of Columbia: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 124986, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 112892
- California: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 117066, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 104341
- Delaware: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 93778, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 94956
- Ohio: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 87266, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 94954
- New York: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 102018, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 94599
- Washington: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 98713, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 91089
- North Dakota: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 79613, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 90291
- Rhode Island: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 91048, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 89206
- Pennsylvania: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 86413, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 88720
- Utah: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 82802, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 86508
- Wyoming: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 76650, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 83724
- New Hampshire: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 88144, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 83633
- Maryland: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 86869, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 83047
- Connecticut: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 86049, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 82580
- Nevada: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 79964, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 81712
- Massachusetts: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 87838, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 81577
- Vermont: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 78123, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 80422
- Wisconsin: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 74014, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 79397
- Minnesota: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 77264, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 78599
- New Mexico: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 71496, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 78584
- Alabama: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 68705, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 77113
- Louisiana: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 68292, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 76992
- Iowa: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 67736, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 76306
- New Jersey: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 82755, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 75963
- Nebraska: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 67976, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 75288
- Colorado: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 76563, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 75168
- Idaho: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 68476, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 74240
- Montana: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 67270, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 73912
- Michigan: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 68460, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 72601
- South Carolina: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 66712, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 71368
- Virginia: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 72246, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 71297
- Oregon: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 74436, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 71019
- Georgia: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 67559, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 70014
- Hawaii: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 75494, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 68817
- Kentucky: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 60639, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 67459
- Kansas: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 60338, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 67110
- Maine: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 65614, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 66978
- Tennessee: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 60752, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 65968
- Missouri: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 59384, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 65183
- Arizona: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 65503, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 65021
- West Virginia: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 55293, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 61688
- Indiana: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 56399, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 61239
- South Dakota: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 53003, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 60128
- Mississippi: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 52005, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 59919
- Texas: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 57662, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 59360
- Arkansas: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 50859, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 58587
- Florida: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 59077, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 57004
- Oklahoma: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 49153, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 55427
- North Carolina: Nominal FY2023 estimate $ 49852, BEA RPP-adjusted estimate $ 52810
Source: NCES CCD F-33 instructional-salary expenditure and teacher FTE, FY2023; BEA Regional Price Parities, all-items, 2023. Read the method and download the state comparison.
Reuse this state comparison
Download the same FY2023 state summary in CSV or JSON, or embed the top-ten panel. The embed preserves a visible PlainTeacher and NCES attribution; the release covers this derived state summary only.
The top 3
All ranked jurisdictions
The pale bar behind each figure shows its magnitude within this table; hover a value for the exact comparison and rank.
| # | State | Est. Avg. Salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | District of Columbia DC | |
| 2 | California CA | |
| 3 | Delaware DE | |
| 4 | New York NY | |
| 5 | Rhode Island RI | |
| 6 | Washington WA | |
| 7 | New Hampshire NH | |
| 8 | Connecticut CT | |
| 9 | Massachusetts MA | |
| 10 | Maryland MD | |
| 11 | Pennsylvania PA | |
| 12 | Nevada NV | |
| 13 | Ohio OH | |
| 14 | Utah UT | |
| 15 | New Jersey NJ | |
| 16 | Wyoming WY | |
| 17 | Hawaii HI | |
| 18 | Vermont VT | |
| 19 | Wisconsin WI | |
| 20 | New Mexico NM | |
| 21 | Alabama AL | |
| 22 | Minnesota MN | |
| 23 | North Dakota ND | |
| 24 | Oregon OR | |
| 25 | Louisiana LA | |
| 26 | Idaho ID | |
| 27 | South Carolina SC | |
| 28 | Colorado CO | |
| 29 | Arizona AZ | |
| 30 | Iowa IA | |
| 31 | Nebraska NE | |
| 32 | Michigan MI | |
| 33 | Virginia VA | |
| 34 | Maine ME | |
| 35 | Georgia GA | |
| 36 | Montana MT | |
| 37 | Kansas KS | |
| 38 | Tennessee TN | |
| 39 | Florida FL | |
| 40 | Kentucky KY | |
| 41 | West Virginia WV | |
| 42 | Indiana IN | |
| 43 | Missouri MO | |
| 44 | Texas TX | |
| 45 | Mississippi MS | |
| 46 | South Dakota SD | |
| 47 | North Carolina NC | |
| 48 | Oklahoma OK | |
| 49 | Arkansas AR |
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD) F-33 Survey.
What this estimated average salary actually measures
Each state figure is instructional-salary expenditure divided by reported teacher full-time-equivalent in the FY2023 NCES F-33 release. PlainTeacher applies the same district filter everywhere: only districts with enrollment of at least 200 and a salary estimate between $30,000 and $200,000 enter the state average. That keeps tiny or non-reporting districts from moving a headline number, but it also means the figure is a derived state aggregate, not a published salary schedule, a starting offer, or total compensation with benefits.
How to read this ranking
Use the table for a consistent FY2023 comparison across jurisdictions. A higher nominal estimate does not automatically mean better purchasing power; the scatter chart above shows the same estimate after BEA's FY2023 all-items Regional Price Parity adjustment. When the mean sits well above the median in a state, a few large districts are pulling the average up, which is why the table includes both median district and districts-counted columns.
For an individual decision, follow a state profile, then a district page, then local contract or HR sources. This ranking cannot tell you what one teacher earns, whether a shortage exists, or how pension and health benefits compare.
Why District of Columbia leads and California sits second
District of Columbia ranks first in this FY2023 comparison at $124,986 across 1 counted districts. California follows at $110,546. Delaware is third at $92,029. These positions reflect the aggregated F-33 inputs for each jurisdiction, not a policy scorecard. A jurisdiction can rank high because its counted districts report higher instructional-salary expenditure relative to reported FTE, because its district mix skews toward larger enrollments, or because fewer small districts dilute the average.
The District of Columbia often appears near the top because it is a single urban jurisdiction in the dataset rather than a mix of rural and suburban districts. Large states such as California or New York can sit slightly lower in nominal rank while still dominating total enrollment and district counts. Read rank, median district, and enrollment counted together instead of treating the first row as a universal "best place to teach" verdict.
States excluded from this comparison
Alaska and Illinois have no district with a usable teacher-salary estimate in this extract (reported salary between $30k and $200k with enrollment of at least 200), so they are omitted rather than imputed. The list covers 49 jurisdictions. Missing a state here means "no comparable breakout in this release," not "teachers are unpaid."
How figures shift across NCES releases
This page is pinned to FY2023 F-33. When NCES publishes a new finance vintage, state ranks can move because districts enter or leave the counted panel, instructional-salary expenditure is revised, or teacher FTE reporting changes. A state that gains one rank in a new release is not proof that every teacher received a raise; it is proof that the documented inputs moved. PlainTeacher's multi-year improvement ranking uses a fixed district cohort for that reason. After each refresh, compare the release notes on the methodology page before treating a movement as a policy outcome.
How to use this ranking
Treat the table as a FY2023 NCES-derived comparison, then drill down before making a career or policy claim.
- Start with District of Columbia's district-level profile before treating the state average as a job offer. District of Columbia profile
- Compare two states side by side with the same FY2023 estimation method. Salary compare tool
- Nominal rank is not purchasing power; read the BEA price-level comparison before moving across state lines. Cost-of-living guide
- Download or embed the same state summary if you need to cite it elsewhere. Dataset notes
Every figure on this page comes from NCES F-33 instructional-salary expenditure and reported teacher FTE for FY2023. It excludes benefits, local schedules, and individual contracts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which state has the highest estimated teacher salary?
The first row shows the highest state in this FY2023 comparison. The estimate divides instructional-salary expenditure by reported teacher FTE, so it compares the dataset consistently but is not a published contract pay scale.
What does this teacher salary by state list measure?
It measures an estimated average instructional-staff salary for each state, derived from NCES F-33 instructional-salary expenditure and reported teacher FTE. It does not measure benefits, tenure, subject area, or a particular district salary schedule.
Is teacher pay adjusted for cost of living?
No. These are nominal-dollar estimates. A higher figure does not automatically mean greater purchasing power because housing, taxes, benefits, and local costs vary across states.
Does this ranking include benefits?
No. It is based on teacher salary expenditure divided by reported teacher FTE. It does not calculate health insurance, retirement contributions, or other benefits, so it should not be read as total compensation.
Explore More Rankings
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
According to the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) F-33 Local Education Agency Finance Survey, PlainTeacher's figures are computed directly, no number is typed in by an editor. This ranking is computed directly from each district's FY2023 F-33 submission, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error on this page. Data current as of FY2023.
| Publisher | PlainTeacher |
| Sources | Public official public datasets |